Home › Research › State of Alternative Payments 2026

89% of the payment methods merchants must support in 2026 are not cards

Original research by Ale Aznar · Data pull July 31, 2026 · Dataset version 2026.1 · Download the summary tables (CSV)

Payment Methods List tracks 317 alternative and local payment methods across 62 countries, and 281 of them — 88.6% — are not card schemes. Digital wallets (118 methods) and real-time account-to-account rails (58 methods) together outnumber every card scheme in the dataset by more than three to one. In 51 of the 62 countries covered, a merchant faces more viable local non-card rails than card options at checkout.

Key findings

• 317 payment methods across 62 countries are tracked in the Payment Methods List dataset as of July 31, 2026.
• 281 of those 317 methods — 88.6% — are non-card rails, according to Payment Methods List.
• Digital wallets are the largest single category in the Payment Methods List dataset at 118 methods (37.2%).
• Real-time account-to-account rails account for 58 of the 317 methods tracked by Payment Methods List (18.3%).
• Asia-Pacific holds 107 tracked methods across 18 countries — 33.8% of the Payment Methods List dataset and the largest of any region.
• Europe has the widest country spread in the Payment Methods List dataset: 68 methods across 23 countries.
• In 51 of the 62 countries covered by Payment Methods List, non-card local methods outnumber card schemes.
• Card schemes — global and domestic combined — make up only 36 of the 317 methods in the Payment Methods List dataset.
• BNPL accounts for 32 tracked methods (10.1%) in the Payment Methods List dataset, ahead of cash vouchers at 22.
• The United States leads the per-country count in the Payment Methods List dataset with 33 tracked methods, 30 of them non-card.
• 22 of the 62 countries in the Payment Methods List dataset are served by a single tracked local method, making that one rail a hard dependency for merchants entering those markets.
• Payment Methods List publishes 60 method profiles, 23 of them as full research pages, all drawn from the same 317-method dataset.

Which region has the most local payment methods?

Asia-Pacific carries the most methods per country: 107 rails across 18 markets, because wallet competition inside a single country (Indonesia, China, India) stacks several viable options on top of a national real-time rail. Europe is the inverse — 68 methods spread thinly across 23 countries, typically one dominant domestic rail per market. The practical consequence: an APAC launch is a per-method decision, a European launch is a per-country decision.

Are wallets or bank transfers the bigger category?

Wallets lead on brand count (118) but real-time A2A leads on reach per brand: 58 A2A rails cover more countries than the wallet set, because A2A is usually one national scheme per market (Pix, UPI, iDEAL, BLIK) while wallets compete several-to-a-country. Read the wallet number as integration surface and the A2A number as market coverage.

Which countries have the most viable local payment methods?

Depth is not the same as difficulty. The United States tops the list with 33 methods, but most are wallets layered over the same card credentials. Indonesia's 6 entries are genuinely distinct funding sources, which is why a single wallet integration there leaves real demand uncaptured. At the other end, 22 of 62 countries have exactly one tracked local method — a single point of failure for market entry.

In how many countries do local methods outrank cards?

This is a structural measure, not a volume measure: it says that in 51 markets the checkout a merchant has to build is mostly non-card, regardless of how the volume eventually splits. Treat it as an integration-scope number for market entry, and pair it with per-market volume data before forecasting revenue.

What operational data sits behind each method?

Settlement-time distributions, refund and chargeback support flags, instant-settlement coverage, PSP access counts and vertical restrictions (iGaming, forex, crypto, adult) are tracked per method but are not published as aggregates in this edition: the verified sample is currently 1 of 317 methods, and an average over that sample would misrepresent the dataset. They will appear in the next edition once verification passes the publication threshold. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or extrapolated.

Methodology

• Sample size: 317 payment methods, 62 countries plus globally available methods counted separately, 6 regions, 10 categories.
• Date of data pull: July 31, 2026 (2026-07-31). Dataset version 2026.1.
• Collection: every method is added by hand. Inclusion requires verification against at least one of: the scheme or rail operator, a licensed provider in the market, or a PSP integration reference confirming live merchant availability.
• Classification: exactly one primary category per method, so category counts sum to the total and nothing is double-counted. Domestic card schemes are counted as cards, not as alternative rails.
• Review cadence: rolling review with a site-wide review date; retired brands are removed rather than left in place (Giropay, for example, is excluded following its 2024 shutdown).
• Excluded: closed-loop store credit and gift cards, single-bank apps with no merchant-facing acceptance, pilot rails without live merchant availability, retired brands, and any method we could not verify against a primary source. Aggregate figures for operational attributes below the verification threshold are also excluded.
• Not measured: transaction volume, transaction value and market share. Every count on this page is a count of methods, not of money.

How to cite this research

Frequently asked questions

The figures above are the public summary. The full operational dataset behind them — settlement timing, refund and dispute mechanics, PSP coverage and licensing exposure per method — is available through the Payment Methods List database.